tirsdag 15. mai 2012


Saving places I thought I saw.

I think the author wants to say that pollution must stop because it’s killing species. When she says that she killed all the animals I think she means that all of us must do something to help the environment. Because even though some things may seem small if we all do it we can make a difference. If a person thinks that it doesn’t matter if I do something for the environment because my little help won’t do anything. That is what makes the difference because that guy is not alone. Many people think like this, and that is what I think the author means. All of these people that think like this could do the little thing and make the environment better. That is why she says me, because she is an example on the guy that thinks his help won’t do anything.

The author uses examples that are normal for us in this lifetime like sea and honey bee to not exist. I think this is very good because it is scary to think about these things disappearing. This opens eyes, and making people understand why they should stop pollution.

torsdag 26. januar 2012

Arne Næss

Arne Næss deep ecology is a philosophy wich involves that humans are not the only one one the earth, and that the humans need to respect the earth and all the other things living on it.

This relates to our page 262 and 214 in searching 10 because the pages is about animals which almost get removed from the earth because of the humans. It is also written aboutpollution which relates to the ecology as well. The animals on the earth where getting hunted down and almost every animal of one rase where killed, but the animals are getting protected and it's not allowed to kill some of them now. This relates very good to the ecology because when it's not allowed to kill a rase enymore humans show that they allso cares about animals.
The pollution is very bad though, but some countries are worse than others. These countries lives a bit up to the ecology. A quote from the Hopi indians says: When the last three is chopped down. When the rivers are poisened. When the last fish is caught. That is when you realise you can't eat money. This relates very much to these things. Humans are way to greedy and we need to care more about the enviroment.

mandag 10. oktober 2011

RLE opppgave om refleksjon

Problemstillingen er som følger: du lever i Øst-Tyskland under den kalde krigen du har en datter som har kjempe bra karekterer og hun skal på univarsitet, men så sier Stasi at du må bli informant. Hvis du nekter kommer ikke datteren din inn på universitet.

Stasi.
Stasi var det hemmelige politiet som holdt på i Øst-Tyskland under den kalde krigen. De skulle følge med på alle som bodde i Øst-Tyskland og bekjempe motstandere av lederne i Øst-Tyskland. Stasi hadde rundt 600 000 informanter under styret sitt. Informantene informerte om andre folk sine liv altså tystet. Det informantene sa kunne ha stor betydning, men det kunne også bare være ubrukelig information.
Mer om Stasi finner du her

Jeg tenker på noen forskjelige løsninger for det er ikke sikkert jeg ville gått med på å bli informant.
Løsning en er: Å bli informant og få datteren min inn på universitet.
Løsning to er: Å bli informant, men bare fortelle unyttige ting som når naboen spiser brød, men få datteren min inn på universitet.
Løsning tre er: Er å ikke bli informant, men ødelegge karriæren til datteren min.
Løsning fire: Er å prøve å rømme byen.

Løsning en ville blitt feil for meg jeg kunne ikke tystet på andre. Her tenker jeg på konsekvensetikk og det er at jeg vil ikke ødelegge andre sitt liv for at datteren min ikke skulle komme på universitet. Pliktetikk er da at jeg ikke skal tyste på andre for det er ikke lov. Selv om datteren min ville kommet inn på universitet er det som er i mot mye viktigere for meg.
Løsning to ville kansje vært et alternativ fordi da kunne jeg bare sagt helt ugustige ting til Stasi og jeg ville fått datteren min inn på universitet, men her kan det jo hende at Stasi griper inn og sier at jeg må fortelle mer nyttige ting.
Løsning tre å ikke bli informant ville være riktig fordi da hadde jeg ikke tystet på andre og ingen ville lide. Utenom da datteren min, dette ville da blitt en ganske stor konsekvens for da haddde jo hele kariæren hennes gått istykker. med tanke på at flere mennesker kunne lidet enn bare datteren min kunne det være ganske riktig.
Løsning fire kunne være en mulighet, men det ville være ekstremt vanskelig. Fordi det var jo en lang mur rundt byen og den var veldig bevoktet. Konsekvensene her kunne blitt at jeg og datteren min døde og det ville vært værre en at kariæren til datteren min var ødelagt.

Konklusjon: Jeg ville gått for løsning to fordi da ville datteren min kommet inn på universitet uten at jeg tystet på noe viktig og ødela noen andre sine liv. Selv om det kanskje ville hende at Stasi grep inn og sa jeg måtte gjøre noe mer viktig ville jeg tatt sjansen.

onsdag 21. september 2011

The korean war our shcool project

The Korean war was a armed conflict and it last in almost 3 years.
The Korean War was between North Korea and South Korea. North Korea was occupied by the Soviet Union and South Korea was occupied by USA.  In June 1950 the war started with the North Korean went in to South Korea. With forces supported by 180 planes, 135 000 soldiers and 243 tanks. Against a much smaller and worse army in South Korea. With only 65 000 soldiers with not so good armor as North Korea had. They didn’t had any tanks or air support either. North Korea came long into South Korea. Now the South Korea got more help from USA and the pushed North Korea all the way up to the capital in North Korea, but then the Chinese started to help North Korea. So now it was North Korea with the Soviet Union and China on their side vs. South Korea with USA on their side. And with China on the team North Korea started to push South Korea out of their country. In 1951 the North Korean troops made their way in to South again.
Fn wanted to stop this war and tried to send soldiers to the war. They got a warning to not enter the kinesis land, it could affect the military, and it was tough winters up in the mountains.
But the leader rejected this and went to the mountains, but fn heard about this and command that they had to go to Japan and stay there.
In November 1950 they first troops of the kinesis went in to the war and more troops came for every day. But when the winter came it came for full and the American soldiers wasn’t prepared for a so cold winter. The kinesis too advantage of this and killed as many American as they could.
But because they went so fast in to the front they lost many soldiers too.

Ceasefire
The ceasefire conflicts lasted in for two years. To get a final conclusion they had to use a neutral group which could solve every international problem they where Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission.
Lost
Man can’t now how many who died but it’s around 2-3 millions and over 1,5 million of them was civilians and 800 000 soldiers were killed.

The war is not finished because it just has been a ceasefire and not real peace.